I read an interesting article in The Economist today. It addresses the value of the Open Source “collaborative process”. Some of these concepts were briefly addressed in my presentation to the group on February 2.
It is a 5 page article and you may not have the time for it. Here is a quote of the few, most significant paragraphs with potential applicability to us:
“Rather than a democracy, open source looks like a Darwinian meritocracy. The tools for extremely productive online collaboration exist. What is still missing are ways to “identify and deploy not just manpower, but expertise,” says Beth Noveck of New York University Law School (who is applying open-source practices to scrutinising software-patent applications, with an eye to invalidating dubious ones). In other words, even though open-source is egalitarian at the contributor level it can nevertheless be elitist when it comes to accepting contributions. In this way, many open-source projects look more hierarchical than the corporate organograms the approach is supposed to have torn up.
Even if the cracks in the management of open source can be plugged by some fairly straightforward organisational controls, might it nevertheless remain only a niche activity—occupying, essentially, the space between a corporation and a commune? There are two doubts about its staying power.
The first is how innovative it can remain in the long run. Indeed, open source might already have reached a self-limiting state, says Steven Weber, a political scientist at the University of California at Berkeley, and author of “The Success of Open Source” (Harvard University Press, 2004). “Linux is good at doing what other things already have done, but more cheaply—but can it do anything new? Wikipedia is an assembly of already-known knowledge,” he says.
The second doubt is whether the motivation of contributors can be sustained. Companies are good at getting people to rise at dawn for a day's dreary labour. But the benefit of open-source approaches is that they can tap into a far larger pool of resources essentially at no cost. Once the early successes are established, it is not clear that the projects can maintain their momentum, says Christian Alhert, the director of Openbusiness.cc, which examines the feasibility of applying open-source practices to commercial ventures.
But there are arguments in favour of open source, too. Ronald Coase, a Nobel prize-winning economist, noted that firms will handle internally what it would otherwise cost more to do externally through the market. The open-source approach seems to turn this insight on its head and it does so thanks to the near-zero cost of shipping around data. A world in which communication is costly favours collaborators working alongside each other; in a world in which it is essentially free, they can be in separate organisations in the four corners of the earth.
Perhaps that is why open source is taking up a permanent place as a facet of modern business. As open source begins to look more corporate, corporations themselves are looking to adopt and adapt more open-source practices.”
The two “limitations” suggested above I would address as follows:
1) Can “the Open Source process” do anything new, can it innovate? The answer may be negative, I am not sure. We as an organization can always innovate, without relying on the “community” to deliver those innovations to us. It is the other part of the quote that interests me: “Linux is good at doing what other things already have done, but more cheaply … Wikipedia is an assembly of already-known knowledge”. If we can do more cheaply the “already invented and well established” business of local government in the style of Linux and Wikipedia, we would have saved money.
2) Can we sustain the motivation of contributors? In our case, the contributors would be other local governments who share the cost of developing or maintaining a common software application. Out of more then 50 local governments in Virginia and more then 20,000 in the US, I believe it is likely that we will find a small group which is equally concerned with the escalating cost of software and is willing to collaborate and save.
I am not offering this article as “proof” that Open Source is “the way to go”. Nor am I inviting a debate on the subject. In my judgment, adopting a collaborative process, where applicable, is the best opportunity I am aware of that could potentially limit the increase in our software costs in the future. Open Source is one popular collaborative model, but it is not the only one.
"Open Source" Facts (for those who may not already know)
Posted byAnonymous Userat
2007-04-24 12:34 AM
Originally, the Open Source Definition "started life as a policy document of the Debian GNU/Linux Distribution. There are many inclusive licenses in the realm of Open Source Software. All of the licenses that are noted by this work have one feature in common which is "they each disclaim all warranties." The intention of this disclaimer is the protection of the owner of the software from liability connected to the software program." This is considered to be reasonable in that there is not sufficient revenue from the program for liability insurance and legal fees to be funded. Open source software is defined as software containing no royalty or other fee imposed upon the redistribution of the software; the source code is available; unlike with published essays or books, the right to create modifications and derivative works exists; it may require modified versions to be distributed as the original version plus patches, there is no discrimination against persons or groups contained in the software as well as no discrimination against fields of endeavor; all rights granted must flow through to and with redistributed versions; the license applies to the program as a whole and each of its components, and the license must not restrict the other software thus permitting the distribution of open source and closed source software together. Open source software is defined as: any software program that has a source code which is made available for its' use or modification as developers or other users see fit and it is generally developed in the manner of public collaboration and thereby made available freely. Open Source is also a certification mark that is owned by the OSI or Open Source Initiative and it is intended to be share both freely and even as an improved and redistributed version by others who abide by the distribution terms of the Open Source Initiative's Definition. This software is such that may be distributed or redistributed to other parties without any encumbrances of restrictions. Furthermore the source code must be available for the party receiving the software to possess the capability of improvement or modification of the software.
I sincerely hope that open source projects will continue to be sustainable even though it may face greater challenges. There needs to be greater acknowledgement of their efforts in order to create a sustainable supply.
Singapore Church, Internet Business Blog, LinksFactory Web Directory, Eonte Web Directory
I think the way any open source project develops can be elitist. At the start look at Linux. It was a one man show and some friends. He opened it to develop and other folks started to contribute. So at the start the process can be elitist but it does open up. Look at Wordpress the ultimate blog platform. Well thats my read on the situation.
This is a romantic view of much of what is happening on the internet. Yes there are free systems and resources developed for wide use on the internet. BUT these free resources are increasingly used to bait and manipulate users. Google is the master technician of this strategy. Its the "free rider" problem in reverse (lets call it the "free giver" problem) and another good example of what happens if there is just one person taking an action compared to the disaster that occurs if everyone does it! One person giving Google free access to all their preferences and decisions in exchange for, say, a "taylor made" google home page - no biggie. But when a large percentage of people do it - then the payoff for google is enormous - market information that is used to increase control over all other businesses on the internet, to target strategic internet businesses for takeover and to trade political favors for information unwittingly provided by internet users who know not what they give. It a part of what I call "take away marketing" and is an ironic out come of a technology that grew so rapidly basically because of the enormous generosity of the masses.
Orlando Florida vacation packages save you money at Orlando hotels. Big discounts at Orlando theme park attractions and shows. Enjoy Orlando.us fun under the Florida sun.
I read an interesting article in The Economist today. It addresses the value of the Open Source “collaborative process”. Some of these concepts were briefly addressed in my presentation to the group on February 2.
It is a 5 page article and you may not have the time for it. Here is a quote of the few, most significant paragraphs with potential applicability to us:
“Rather than a democracy, open source looks like a Darwinian meritocracy. The tools for extremely productive online collaboration exist. What is still missing are ways to “identify and deploy not just manpower, but expertise,” says Beth Noveck of New York University Law School (who is applying open-source practices to scrutinising software-patent applications, with an eye to invalidating dubious ones). In other words, even though open-source is egalitarian at the contributor level it can nevertheless be elitist when it comes to accepting contributions. In this way, many open-source projects look more hierarchical than the corporate organograms the approach is supposed to have torn up.
Even if the cracks in the management of open source can be plugged by some fairly straightforward organisational controls, might it nevertheless remain only a niche activity—occupying, essentially, the space between a corporation and a commune? There are two doubts about its staying power.
The first is how innovative it can remain in the long run. Indeed, open source might already have reached a self-limiting state, says Steven Weber, a political scientist at the University of California at Berkeley, and author of “The Success of Open Source” (Harvard University Press, 2004). “Linux is good at doing what other things already have done, but more cheaply—but can it do anything new? Wikipedia is an assembly of already-known knowledge,” he says.
The second doubt is whether the motivation of contributors can be sustained. Companies are good at getting people to rise at dawn for a day's dreary labour. But the benefit of open-source approaches is that they can tap into a far larger pool of resources essentially at no cost. Once the early successes are established, it is not clear that the projects can maintain their momentum, says Christian Alhert, the director of Openbusiness.cc, which examines the feasibility of applying open-source practices to commercial ventures.
But there are arguments in favour of open source, too. Ronald Coase, a Nobel prize-winning economist, noted that firms will handle internally what it would otherwise cost more to do externally through the market. The open-source approach seems to turn this insight on its head and it does so thanks to the near-zero cost of shipping around data. A world in which communication is costly favours collaborators working alongside each other; in a world in which it is essentially free, they can be in separate organisations in the four corners of the earth.
Perhaps that is why open source is taking up a permanent place as a facet of modern business. As open source begins to look more corporate, corporations themselves are looking to adopt and adapt more open-source practices.”
The two “limitations” suggested above I would address as follows:
1) Can “the Open Source process” do anything new, can it innovate? The answer may be negative, I am not sure. We as an organization can always innovate, without relying on the “community” to deliver those innovations to us. It is the other part of the quote that interests me: “Linux is good at doing what other things already have done, but more cheaply … Wikipedia is an assembly of already-known knowledge”. If we can do more cheaply the “already invented and well established” business of local government in the style of Linux and Wikipedia, we would have saved money.
2) Can we sustain the motivation of contributors? In our case, the contributors would be other local governments who share the cost of developing or maintaining a common software application. Out of more then 50 local governments in Virginia and more then 20,000 in the US, I believe it is likely that we will find a small group which is equally concerned with the escalating cost of software and is willing to collaborate and save.
I am not offering this article as “proof” that Open Source is “the way to go”. Nor am I inviting a debate on the subject. In my judgment, adopting a collaborative process, where applicable, is the best opportunity I am aware of that could potentially limit the increase in our software costs in the future. Open Source is one popular collaborative model, but it is not the only one.
Originally, the Open Source Definition "started life as a policy document of the Debian GNU/Linux Distribution. There are many inclusive licenses in the realm of Open Source Software. All of the licenses that are noted by this work have one feature in common which is "they each disclaim all warranties." The intention of this disclaimer is the protection of the owner of the software from liability connected to the software program." This is considered to be reasonable in that there is not sufficient revenue from the program for liability insurance and legal fees to be funded. Open source software is defined as software containing no royalty or other fee imposed upon the redistribution of the software; the source code is available; unlike with published essays or books, the right to create modifications and derivative works exists; it may require modified versions to be distributed as the original version plus patches, there is no discrimination against persons or groups contained in the software as well as no discrimination against fields of endeavor; all rights granted must flow through to and with redistributed versions; the license applies to the program as a whole and each of its components, and the license must not restrict the other software thus permitting the distribution of open source and closed source software together. Open source software is defined as: any software program that has a source code which is made available for its' use or modification as developers or other users see fit and it is generally developed in the manner of public collaboration and thereby made available freely. Open Source is also a certification mark that is owned by the OSI or Open Source Initiative and it is intended to be share both freely and even as an improved and redistributed version by others who abide by the distribution terms of the Open Source Initiative's Definition. This software is such that may be distributed or redistributed to other parties without any encumbrances of restrictions. Furthermore the source code must be available for the party receiving the software to possess the capability of improvement or modification of the software.
Replies to this comment
I sincerely hope that open source projects will continue to be sustainable even though it may face greater challenges. There needs to be greater acknowledgement of their efforts in order to create a sustainable supply. Singapore Church, Internet Business Blog, LinksFactory Web Directory, Eonte Web Directory
Replies to this comment
I agree that Open Source is one popular collaborative model, but it is not the only one.
motorhomes modular home
Some great articles here, thankyou for sharing ! Work at Home
Replies to this comment
I think the way any open source project develops can be elitist. At the start look at Linux. It was a one man show and some friends. He opened it to develop and other folks started to contribute. So at the start the process can be elitist but it does open up. Look at Wordpress the ultimate blog platform. Well thats my read on the situation.
Replies to this comment
This is a romantic view of much of what is happening on the internet. Yes there are free systems and resources developed for wide use on the internet. BUT these free resources are increasingly used to bait and manipulate users. Google is the master technician of this strategy. Its the "free rider" problem in reverse (lets call it the "free giver" problem) and another good example of what happens if there is just one person taking an action compared to the disaster that occurs if everyone does it! One person giving Google free access to all their preferences and decisions in exchange for, say, a "taylor made" google home page - no biggie. But when a large percentage of people do it - then the payoff for google is enormous - market information that is used to increase control over all other businesses on the internet, to target strategic internet businesses for takeover and to trade political favors for information unwittingly provided by internet users who know not what they give. It a part of what I call "take away marketing" and is an ironic out come of a technology that grew so rapidly basically because of the enormous generosity of the masses.
Replies to this comment
Great article, thanks for the info Work at Home
Orlando Vacations
Orlando Florida vacation packages save you money at Orlando hotels. Big discounts at Orlando theme park attractions and shows. Enjoy Orlando.us fun under the Florida sun.
Best Free Games
Free Games Free Online Games Online Games Puzzle Games
Clickbank Specialities
Go2Clickbank Clickbank Ebooks and Clickbank Software
Replies to this comment
Interesting article on open source
Energy Saver
Energy Saving Search Engine Carbon Neutral
Thanks for pointing out the most significant portions of their article.
Business Services Small Business Marketing
Replies to this comment
What is going on here!? Many spam i think? Galileo
Buy Home Online Buy Allergies Online Buy Allegra Online Buy Atarax Online Buy Clarinex Online Buy Claritin Online Buy Zyrtec Online Buy Anti Depressants Online Buy Effexor Xr Online Buy Lexapro Online Buy Pamelor Online Buy Paxil Online Buy Zyprexa Online Buy Anti-convulsants Online Buy Depakote Online Buy Neurontin Online Buy Anti-viral Online Buy Tamiflu Online Buy Antibiotics Online Buy Amoxil Online Buy Cipro Online Buy Zithromax Online Buy Arthritis Online Buy Arava Online Buy Asthma Online Buy Singulair Online Buy Blood Pressure Online Buy Adalat Online Buy Altace Online Buy Avapro Online Buy Cardura Online Buy Coreg Online Buy Coumadin Online Buy Cozaar Online Buy Isoptin Online Buy Lopressor Online Buy Norvasc Online Buy Plavix Online Buy Tenormin Online Buy Cancer Online Buy Nolvadex Online Buy Cholesterol Online Buy Crestor Online Buy Lipitor Online Buy Mevacor Online Buy Pravachol Online Buy Zocor Online Buy Diabetes Online Buy Actos Online Buy Amaryl Online Buy Avandia Online Buy Glucophage Online Buy Glucotrol Xl Online Buy Diuretics Online Buy Lasix Online Buy Gastrointestinal Online Buy Protonix Online Buy Zantac Online Buy Heartburn Online Buy Aciphex Online Buy Nexium Online Buy Prevacid Online Buy Prilosec Online Buy Herbal Online Buy Breast Success Online Buy Enhance 9 Online Buy Euphoria Perfume Online Buy Female Rx Oil Online Buy Female Rx Plus Online Buy Hoodia Gordonii Online Buy Hoodia Patch Online Buy Human Growth Agent Online Buy Joint Formula Online Buy Liquid Rx Plus Online Buy Multi Vitamin Online Buy Premium Diet Patch Online Buy Super Greens Online Buy Virility Patch Rx Online Buy Virility Pills Online Buy Vprx Oil Online Buy Yerba Diet Online Buy Hypertension Online Buy Diovan Online Buy Lotensin Online Buy Men's Health Online Buy Caverta Online Buy Cialis Online Buy Cialis Soft Tabs Online Buy Ed Trial Pack Online Buy Euphoria Cologne Online Buy Flomax Online Buy Kamagra Online Buy Kamagra Oral Jelly Online Buy Levitra Online Buy Propecia Online Buy Silagra Online Buy Tadalis Sx Online Buy Viagra Online Buy Viagra Soft Tabs Online Buy Muscle Relaxant Online Buy Lioresal Online Buy Soma Online Buy Pain Relief Online Buy Celebrex Online Buy Deltasone Online Buy Ultram Online Buy Skin Care Online Buy Lamisil Oral Online Buy Stop Smoking Online Buy Zero Nicotine Patch Online Buy Zyban Online Buy Thyroid Online Buy Synthroid Online Buy Weight Loss Online Buy Florinef Online Online Buy Women's Health Online Buy Clomid Online Buy Diflucan Online Buy Evista Online Buy Fosamax Online Buy Premarin Online
Replies to this comment
Hyper quality Directory Free Nokia Themes Super Car Pro The Arcade Zone Scientists Blog Site Money Mobiles News
Replies to this comment
runescape money runescape gold runescape gold runescape money buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold runescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money Tabula Rasa Credit Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft PowerLeveling Warcraft Power Leveling World of Warcraft PowerLeveling World of Warcraft Power Leveling runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling eve isk eve online isk eve isk eve online isk tibia gold Fiesta Silver Fiesta Gold SilkRoad Gold buy SilkRoad Gold runescape accounts buy runescape accounts rs2 accounts buy rs2 accounts runescape power leveling rs2 power leveling
yahoo search yahoo
Urban Inspiration Gospel Music
Microsoft network msn
articles on obesity Childhood Obesity
Belleville Health home remedies
Digital Camera Digital Camera specifications
Automobile specifications Automobile specifications
Better information. Better health WebMD
Home garden decor Home Garden Decoration
Altavista Search Altavista
Value cruise Deals Cheap Cruise Tickets
Replies to this comment